September 29, 2011

Uncle Sam Takes On BMI And ASCAP

Post image for Uncle Sam Takes On BMI And ASCAP
  • Share
  • Share/Bookmark

By Jeff Price

Here’s the deal: for those of you who know what a public performance is, skip down three paragraphs. For those who don’t, it’s important you know what the public performance right is, as it’s one of your copyrights and it makes you money.

Under U.S., and most international law, the moment a song leaves your head and becomes tangible (meaning it has been recorded and/or written down) you get six legal copyrights.   One of these six copyrights is the exclusive right to “Publicly Perform.”  The right of public performance means that no other person or entity can publicly perform your song without a license from you.  A “public performance” is: your song in a YouTube video, radio play, a stream from Spotify or Pandora, music played in live venues, jukebox play, music played in retail stores and bars, etc…

Any entity that wants to publicly perform a song must get a “public performance” license from the entity that controls the right.  The songwriter controls this right unless he or she has done a deal transferring it to another entity called a “publisher” or a “publishing administrator.”  Almost all songwriters and/or publishers outsource the job of issuing public performance licenses to third party organizations called Performance Rights Organizations (PROs).  These organizations deal with and license this one right on behalf of their members.

In the United States there are three performance rights organizations: BMI, ASCAP and SESAC.  Entities, like radio stations, tv stations, venues, etc… purchase blanket public performance licenses from  these organizations, who are acting on behalf of the songwriter and/or publisher.  Each time a songwriter’s song is publicly performed, the songwriter/publisher is to be paid by the performance rights organization from the money it collects.

However, in the U.S., BMI and ASCAP have such a monopoly in the public performance licensing business that the government decided it needed to intervene and regulate them so no one got screwed. Therefore, the government issued something called a “Consent Decree” that dictates what ASCAP and BMI can and cannot legally do.  (SESAC does not have a governmental consent decree as it does not have a large enough market share to be of concern to the government).

As one example of what you can find in the consent decree, note how the government will not allow ASCAP (or BMI) to have exclusive rights to represent you.

IV.   Prohibited Conduct.  ASCAP is hereby enjoined and restrained from…

(B) Limiting, restricting, or interfering with the right of any member to issue, directly or through an agent other than a performing rights organization, non-exclusive license to music users for rights of public performance.

What this means is you have a choice. You, or the entity that controls the public performance right, can decide to issue your own public performance license with whomever you like even though you are signed up with ASCAP.

If you do this, it means you make more money, as ASCAP will not be taking its 12-20% “administrative fee” off the top.

For those of you who have signed up with these PROs, you should read the consent decrees.  Why? Because as you hired these organizations to work for you, you should know the rules.  With this knowledge you can make informed decisions and decide if they are doing their job.  If they are not, fire them.

Armed with information that protects you, the next time a PRO refuses to provide you with information such as what rates they charge someone or how they calculate your royalties, now you have your knowledge of the consent decree to support your request.

Here’s some icing on the cake.  The U.S. Department of Justice has a separate division that actually oversees BMI and ASCAP to make certain you don’t get screwed. If your PRO tries to bully you, doesn’t respond to you, or does something that violates the consent decree, you can call the Department of Justice and tell them.  It’s the DOJ’s job to follow up with the PRO to make certain they follow the law.

We now present to you for download as PDFs the two very public, but hard to find, Consent Decrees that govern how ASCAP and BMI work.

We think you’ll find these documents to be pretty interesting. In some ways, you, educated artists, may be the PROs’ worst nightmare, as the last thing they want is an educated boss!

So read away and post your findings or comments here.

ASCAP Consent Decree

BMI Consent Decree

September 29, 2011 · 57 comments in Jeff's Postings,Music Publishing & Copyright,The Industry

  • Morrisoncraig

    thank you for this information, i have over 200 songs for sale on the internet at various locations.

    craig morrison
    roundtownsound

  • Professor Pooch

    In that, many clubs have been knocked out of the business of providing Indie/Unsigned Artists gigs because they can’t pay the large fees demanded by the PRO’s for providing music, could this be interpreted as, as long as these Artists, doing solely their own original material, sign a form with a club, stating that they’re waiving a PRO fee for the Performance of their Music, the club can provide these Artists with a place to play without interference from the PRO’s???

  • Anonymous

    @ Professor Pooch

    Absolutely. These are your rights. As per the consent decree, you can issue your own licenses to whomever you want. The deal with ASCAP and/or BMI is non-exlusive
    jeff

  • Somewhat alarmed…..

    The government needs to stay out of private business. If you signed an agreement, then be sure you have read it. If you are too stupid or ignorant to understand such an agreement, then don’t sign it in the first place. Or hire an attorney. We don’t need our tax dollars being spent on gov’t acting like a traffic cop. They make it seem like they’ve “got your back”. Look at the bigger picture though. Moves like this will eventually force private business to close down. When Ascap and BMI are gone, who will you then look to in order to ollect your public performance royalties?

  • Professor Pooch

    Thank You, Jeff!!!  This solves a major problem for the Indie Artists!!!

  • Anonymous

    @somewhat alarmed

    you are more than welcome to affiliate with an agency that has no government control
    Me? I want someone watching people that have monopolies so they dont screw me or others.
    Do you honestly believe in the digital music world ASCAP / BMI are suited to provide this service?!
    Thus the reason why TuneCore is now doing this.

    Here some hard facts. TuneCore songwriters earned over $120 million dollars but have not been able to get their money
    Why?!

    Because this old school, out of date, non-transparent, “screw you, what are you going to do about it system” STOLE their money
    You want to give your money to Warner Bros., Universal, EMI, Sony you go right ahead
    In the meantime, Im going to change this system and get songwriters back their money more quickly with more transparency and an audit trail
    Dont believe me? Then get the hell out of the way as its already happening.
    Jeff

  • Audioworks247

    Thank you TUNECORE FOR HAVING OUR BACKS. I always said music was about 90% business and the rest was on the musician. Its always the man in the suit and tie trying to hurry to the box office before the show ends to collect the money while the band is on stage sweating for pennies and what ever watered down drinks the club owner gave him. :) :) LMAO  It’s true,, I am an older musician I have seen it all.

    THANKS TUNECORE, WE LOVE YOU.

  • Mr.Murder

    VIII(A) is a huge vague swath of rates/compensation changes that can apply to any standing contract. Yeah the DoJ really stuck to the PRO by codifying the arbitrary right to change your deal based on their own PRO perceptions of a fair market.

    Got your PRO papers, comrade?

  • Anonymous

    @audioworks247

    without you we are nothing. With you, we are able to change this industry for the better
    Its great when morals line up with a business model!

    jeff

  • Anonymous

    @audioworks247

    without you we are nothing. With you, we are able to change this industry for the better
    Its great when morals line up with a business model!

    jeff

  • Anonymous

    @audioworks247

    without you we are nothing. With you, we are able to change this industry for the better
    Its great when morals line up with a business model!

    jeff

  • Mr.Murder

    *Disclaimer:
    About to join BMI for the need to track hopeful future sales and play.

  • Anonymous

    @Mr Murder

    I love an educated voice!!

    Tell us more.

    Its also cool to watch the courts break down the PRO walls. DMX vs. BMI and WPIX vs BMI are two great recent cases
    Not to mention the Pandora vs. ASCAP fight

    jeff

  • Scottman

    You know what ? We DO need government  spending our tax dollars acting like a traffic cop for certain “businesses”.  Just like we need TRAFFIC COPS.
    Now if we can only prevent the “businesses” from buying the government to do their bidding, as opposed to doing the bidding of the MAJORITY, that much better. 
    Let’s watch how much of YOUR money ASCAP & BMI spend on propaganda against everything that might adversely affect their monopoly.

  • Anonymous

    @ Mr. Murder

    if you use TuneCore to distribute, we can get your more of your public performance money, more quickly with transparency and a audit trail
    just email songwriterinfo@tunecore.com with your TuneCore email address and we can flag your account to allow the offer to appear
    jeff

  • Anonymous

    A REQUEST TO ALL OF YOU!!

    I have asked ASCAP to disclose to TuneCore the rates they charge Netflix, Pandora, YouTube etc
    They flat our said no

    So I ask all of you – do you know what rates they charge? You Should! They work for you!
    If you do know, post those rates here!

    jeff

  • joseph Nicoletti

    if you are A Writer/producer/performer/musician etc…. and you do Get “lucky” and have any kind of Hit,..you will need the “Professional” help of Many People, not just BMI or ASCAP.!..lets see WHY.. you will be performing,publishing (we can spend many days on this subject alone!).producing-booking-promotion… Shall i go on!,.. you get the picture I’m sure,.with out these other Professional People and Companies you may make a bit more ,,, but look at all the Fun and relationships you’ll be missing…any way.  if you NEED /respect & want “Professional” help and advise Contact:  Joseph nicoletti consulting-promotion P.o.Box 386 Laguna Beach ,California,92652 USA   ph 949-715-7036   musicbiz@cox.net..

  • Jjocrimson

    This raises a concern to me about cover bands that play clubs and bars making in excess of $2000 a night. It seems doubtful the PRO’s are getting paid considering the sets these bands play are sometimes 25-40 songs over the course of 3 hours. How can they ensure the copyrights are being enforced and followed by seedy club owners?

  • claudekachi

    thanksssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 

  • Willblacmusic

    I’m uneducated and confused. I associated with ASAP sight unseen. I was under the impression that they were on our(writers/publishers) side. You know, collecting on ‘our’ behalf and watching ‘our’ backs. Am I wrong? They’re the bad guys?

  • Willblacmusic

    Sorry, I meant ASCAP.

  • Scottman

    Jesus…Where in this country do they have bars & clubs that pay cover bands $2000 a night ?
    Beyond that, ASCAP & BMI have folks searching the internet for live music venues and then they send representatives out to said clubs/bars/restaurants/coffeehouses to not to SELL them on the benefits of a license, but using what is tantamount to extortion by threatening to sue them if ANY music is played, be it live performance or prerecorded background music while you dine.
    They have their “enforcers” and  I know for a fact that these tactics limit where ANY musician/songwriter can ply their craft. The venue owners are not without blame for being inherently cheap or greedy, but in this situation they are the “little guy” being abused by the big corporation.

  • Scottman

    They are primarily concerned with only those writers/publishers that are successful enough to  bring in the kinds of revenues that keep them in business.

  • Csdbarajas

    Hi im an independant artist and i am a member if ascap can i still be a membe of tunescore and sell my music thhrough tunescoore or will i get in trouble wwith ascap?

  • Anonymous

    @JJocrimson

    its a good point. But I think this has to start with ASCAP/BMI getting TRANSPARENT!
    How are any of us supposed to know if the venues are or are not in licenses and what they are paying if ASCAP and BMI will not tell us
    Demand for them to tell you. Once you have this info, you can then determine what to do next
    jeff

  • Anonymous

    welcomeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    jeff

  • Csdbarajas

    Another question how and where do i gget the license that you mentiioned of public pperformance?

  • Anonymous

    ASCAP/BMI were built to do something good, get songwriters their money
    along they way, they lost their path a bit. The refuse to tell you how much money they charge people and how they calculated your royalties
    the also sit on your money for upwards of a year when it can get to you each month
    they take a % of your money to offset their costs to collect it and get it back to you
    Unfortunately, these “costs” now included six to seven figure salaries for their execs, a fleet of cars, dinners, three levels of office space across from Lincoln Center in New York, parties and teams of on staff lawyers to attack anyone that tries to get them to be transparent
    its not right, but you do need them

    however, TuneCore does some of what they do. We can cut them out thereby getting you more money, more quickly with transparency and an audit trail
    jeff

  • Anonymous

    they do indeed serve this purpose, and there is no one else that can do it but them
    just wish they were transparent about things and did not take a % of your money for their cars, six figure salaries, dinners, parties and teams of lawyers to sue companies like TuneCore that are trying to get more of you your money more quickly with transparency
    they lost their way!

    jeff

  • Anonymous

    @scottman

    DEAD ON!

    this means the little guys are not getting the proper share of their money.
    ask them to be transparent and tell them HOW MUCH THEY CHARGE AND HOW THEY CALCULATE YOUR ROYALTIES
    if they wont tell you, its because they are hiding something

    jeff

  • Anonymous

    ASCAP is hired by you to do ONE thing for you, public performances

    Take a moment to read the six legal copyrights here

    http://www.tunecore.com/copyright

    There is no conflict if you use TuneCore.

    jeff

  • Anonymous

    if you wrote the song, you control the rights to it

    if you want to use someone else song for public performance, you have to get a license from either ASCAP/BMI/SESAC or another entity that controls it
    please read this for more info

    http://www.tunecore.com/copyright

    jeff

  • Lloyd Shar Music

    The BMI Consent Decree was dated 12/10/1964. Has there been any updates to this document since then?

  • Anonymous

    @lloyd Shar Music

    good catch!

    yes, it was updated in 1994 (if i recall) and these documents reflect those updates
    jeff

  • Zbig Volin

    Is government going to regulate so no
    one gets screwed? Wow! Or we just live in dream land, or more like a la la
    land because of the music being a subject here. We know that the artist is brutally
    screwed up in every possible way. Let’s expose some of the actual data so we
    can face the harsh realism. One of my clients album (Karol Harven “Shamanic Drive”) is
    in a world wide digital distribution in over 50 internet outlets. The payment
    for one song being heard by the audience Karol Harven gets an average 0.6 of a
    cent. (Surprisingly the song “Government Without Secret” generates the whole 1
    cent, may be because of those government regulations Jeff Price talks about). Let’s
    say that average time of one song being played in some facility is 5 minutes. If
    the facility plays music for 24 hours straight they have time for 288 songs, from
    which the artists are getting 1 dollar and 72 cents per day that is about 51 dollars
    per month. We can imagine the whole crew of people involved in delivery so the
    music is heard from the speakers. And those people are apparently not making 51
    dollars per month. Some unqualified labourers in the third world countries may
    be? But the distributors pay their rent, buy food, clothing, transportation etc.
    not all that for monthly payment of 51 dollars, unless they are bums living in
    cardboard boxes. So why the artist, the main creator that reaches into deepest nooks
    of our hearts is degraded to a lowest category? Is there any “government
    without secret” going to take a good look at this ruthless exploitation?  

    Zbig Volin

  • Lloyd Shar Music

    Thanks Jeff. My BMI agreements (Producer & Writer) states that I must not use any other PRO for 5 years, but does allow me to license directly with a music user if I provide BMI with a copy of the contract. How can I use Tunecore as a PRO in this case? Because of your articles, I have not uploaded any of my unreleased music to BMI yet.

  • Anonymous

    @lloyd

    because you are able to carve our specific rights from BMI

    For example, you can say, I dont want BMI to collect/license New Media Transmissions and, per the consent decree, they are no longer empowered to do so
    Also note, you dont need to withdraw anything. The deal with BMI is Non-exclusive. This means I can do what they can d (or you can as well).
    Finally, per the consent decree, they cannot ask for a Term of five years.
    Jeff

  • Egrezinger

    I applaud the decisions made therein.  NO MORE *Just say , “No.”  Was that a Bushism?  Excuse me while I kiss the sky.

    After being personallly raped by supposed “record labels and deals on my first few CD’s, I feel much better armed/informed after reading tje ASCAP details

    While I am an ASCAP member, and have well over the neccesary amounts of songs needed to qualify, I have been raped by online and offline sites, as wel, the “corporate “labels” since 1987.

    Hearing your song on FM radio while driving around in your car is exciting.  However,the internet and other “sites” pay you a pittance ( by my estimation, 80 percent to them, 20 percent to you).” For every airplay unless you are Lady Gaga or Justin Bieber (i.e “signed).” To a major label.

    This enactment is long overdue, especially to solo artists who are songwriters in ASCAP, having sold music over the internet, and have either A.) Not been paid, or have been paid he incorrect amount, or B.) Have been completly hoodwinked by internet downloading “thievers.”(See Jango and Tunecore, as exhibit A & B).

    Jango & Tunecore and many others fit this description to a tee.  They are playing your music for “free,” to be ripped, burnxd, and downloaded illegally for years, by thousands if not millions of listeners. 

    My first official ripoff began in 1987.  Few royalties, if any came to me, and the sites internet or electronic, or “indepemdent” labels and these sites, prevent having truly good music from being heard from the masses, as well as paid for by the masses. 

    I released 4 solo CD’s, where I wrote, played all the insrtruments, owned the copyrights through the copyright office, and received a pittance compared to what I should have received, based on the number of “paid” downloads. However I received a note from them indicating I ranked # 38 as Indie artist of the top 100.  Teah that will really help pay some bils won’t it?

    For example, I paid a year subscription for songs on Tunecore and Jango, had thousands of illegal downloads as a result, and I made next to nothing.  They mde 80 percent or more, I got he rest.

    Part aof the problem is, the internet sites and “labels” (terms used VERY  loosely), Are monoploies within themselves.  They are thieving your music and YOU ar paying for it.

    My next CD, will be relaesed with a major label, or it won’t be released at all.  Too many good musicians/songwriters are being given the shaft, while pop cultur icons/new sensations/TV created “artists”, who neither play nor write most of their songs reap millions.

    Popular music as a whole, in any genre, will continure to suck until, talent overcomes the latest fads.

    Ed Grezinger
    http://www.jango.com/music/ Ed + Grezinger>1+0

  • Anonymous

    @egrezinger

    Umm, i agree with a lot of what you say, but you made an error

    TuneCore is not a place where people can go to listen to or download music
    We are hired by musicians to place their music into iTunes etc. THey keep all their rights and get 100% of the money from the sale of the recordings.
    You made up the fact that TuneCore streams songs for people.

    jeff

  • http://twitter.com/MauraJensen Maura Jensen

    Hey Jeff! This post is perfect timing as I’m trying to figure out PRO’s RIGHT now. I also somewhat blindly joined ASCAP a few years ago, but never really did anything with it because the system seems so NOT user-friendly, I still haven’t even figured out how to submit my songs, but now I’m thinking maybe I SHOULDn’T and just terminate my membership. But I can’t even find anything that says HOW to terminate.

    Anyway, I’m a little confused but very interested in what you just said about Tunecore doing some of what they do, and that you could cut them out and get artists more money. I wasn’t aware that Tunecore does anything like that, but I’d LOVE to know more! And I’d like to know if that is similar to what SoundExchange does, or more advance? (or just different?) Can you give a little more info about what TuneCore can do in this area, or give me a link to somewhere on the site that explains it? THANKS! – Maura

  • http://twitter.com/MauraJensen Maura Jensen

    P.S. just the other day I contacted SESAC and am trying to go through their “selection” process, because it seemed like if they would accept me, at least they might have a more invested interest in my success? Any thoughts about that? Because I’m considering just not affiliating with ANY PRO and avoiding the hassle of a contract etc… As an unsigned, hardworking yet still “emerging” singer songwriter, do you think I even need a PRO like ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC? Thanks, I’d appreciate any advice:)

  • Anonymous

    short version of all of this

    first read this: http://www.tunecore.com/copyright

    next, Yes, you should sign up with a PRO. We do some things better than them, they do some things better than us
    My problem with the PROs is the lack of transparency. They reveal nothing, collect your money – over $10 billion globally in 2009 – and do not pay everyone what they are owed. It aint cool, but its better than nothing
    You are allowed to terminate – read the consent decree and you can see language in there that states how. But before you do, realize that as bad as they can be, they still do things no one else can do.
    In regards to TuneCore, we are collecting public performance royalties directly from some digital services bypassing the PRO and getting more money back to you more quickly with transparency and an audit trail. The PROs cannot, and will not, do that
    jeff

  • http://twitter.com/PetaLocsta Quintius Walker

    Thank you. Do you know how long that I’ve been searching for this? Good looking out.

  • naakunta laab

    when you have on idea about  how the music really works that a plus thanks for this information  big up cd baby thanks you irie much naakuntalaab di future

  • Robert Luman

    In Chicago there is a cover band (Mike & Joe) billed as ‘college rock’. I’ve seen them draw 1000 patrons repeatedly and they work for door receipts  @  $8.00 a head at the venue where I run sound. They pay the booking agent 10%, and the venue is more than happy with receipts from drink sales. So on an average night these guys are pulling down $7200.00 after paying the booking agent.     

    These guys are probably making more dough than most of the artists they cover. And they’re greedy too! They got a guy with a clicker counter at the door and one night a waitresses two kids are there sitting at the bar next to mom’s waitress station. They aren’t there for the band and they stay by mom all night. At the end of the night Mr. Clicker comes over and says “those two people didn’t pay, you owe us another 16 bucks!”, as if $7200 wasn’t enough!!! And there are several other bands in the same category……….FUCK COVER BANDS – SUPPORT ORIGINAL MUSIC

  • Henn_001

    So does this include internet radio stations too?

  • ernest paul a.k.a ep

    am really happy about this i can now promote my songs as well my artiste own legally without the fear of being cheated
     

  • Anonymous

    yes, when a song is played via internet radio, Songwriters are owed money as is the record label and the lead performer
    jeff

  • http://www.facebook.com/will.richardson3 Will Richardson

    No.  If I were you, I wouldn’t join any of them until you have something that is actually being played. If and when you do, you’ll at least have some bargaining power. I’ve been a SESAC writer since the biggest hit they had was “Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer” back in the 80′s.  Although still the smallest, they are “running with the big dogs” now that they acquired the catalogs of Bob Dylan and  Neil Diamond, They also represent Lady Antebellum and are big into the Latino market. A lot might depend on what kind of songs you write. The only reason I joined then was because they gave me a bigger advance than ASCAP or BMI offered.  I don’t know if any of the three are giving much in the way of advances to unknown writers now, though.  That’s another reason for not joining any of them.  However, f you had a hot song, the three would probably try and outbid each other, no doubt, as they did in the 80′s,  SESAC, by the way, was the first to use digital fingerprinting.  But as far has helping you get a deal or find a publisher, they’ve never done squat for me. I found my own publisher. (Unfortunately), who signed me to an exclusive contract and only tied up my songs, making it next to impossible to get anything cut.  The last time I talked to anybody at SESAC, they told me I should write Contemporary Christian music, (which they’re heavily into, but  I think mostly sucks)  and to cut master-quality full-band studio demos.  It amuses me to think what would happen if Dylan were an unknown and took them guitar-vocals of say, “With God on Our Side” or “Blowin’ in the Wind.”  I feel safe in saying they’d tell him to let somebody else sing his demos and show him the door quickly.
    Unless you have the means to keep track of who’s playing your work yourself, I think writers do need a PRO.  Good luck with your writing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/will.richardson3 Will Richardson

    No, Maura.  If I were you, I wouldn’t join any of them until you have something
    that is actually being played. If and when you do, you’ll at least have
    some bargaining power. I’ve been a SESAC writer since the biggest hit
    they had was “Grandma Got Run Over By a Reindeer” back in the 80′s. 
    Although still the smallest, they are “running with the big dogs” now
    that they acquired the catalogs of Bob Dylan and  Neil Diamond, They
    also represent Lady Antebellum and are big into the Latino market. A lot
    might depend on what kind of songs you write. The only reason I joined
    then was because they gave me a bigger advance than ASCAP or BMI
    offered.  I don’t know if any of the three are giving much in the way of
    advances to unknown writers now, though.  That’s another reason for not
    joining any of them.  However, f you had a hot song, the three would
    probably try and outbid each other, no doubt, as they did in the 80′s, 
    SESAC, by the way, was the first to use digital fingerprinting.  But as
    far has helping you get a deal or find a publisher, they’ve never done
    squat for me. I found my own publisher. (Unfortunately), who signed me
    to an exclusive contract and only tied up my songs, making it next to
    impossible to get anything cut.  The last time I talked to anybody at
    SESAC, they told me I should write Contemporary Christian music, (which
    they’re heavily into, but  I think mostly sucks)  and to cut
    master-quality full-band studio demos.  It amuses me to think what would
    happen if Dylan were an unknown and took them guitar-vocals of say,
    “With God on Our Side” or “Blowin’ in the Wind.”  I feel safe in saying
    they’d tell him to let somebody else sing his demos and show him the
    door quickly. Unless you have the means to keep track of who’s
    playing your work yourself, I think writers do need a PRO.  Good luck
    with your writing.

  • Rankinstein

    I’ve been released on tunecore and promoted by Jango for almost two years, 300+ likes on Jango, no sales on either, 11,000+ plays. Go figure.

  • http://twitter.com/MauraJensen Maura Jensen

    Thanks for the reply Jeff! I will look into the copyright info and the consent decree. But I am still kind of confused about how to sign up for TuneCore to collect those public performance royalties. I watched the first youtube video of your recent NYC seminar (awesome info btw!) and you were talking about TuneCore’s “Songwriter Service.” Is that included in the $49.99/year/album listed on your home page, or separate? And does it include the collecting of royalties you’re talking about? From what I can tell the $49.99 looks like its just for “distribution.” I’m definitely planning to sign up with Tunecore for my upcoming release, the site just doesn’t seem to clearly spell out how to sign up for all these things. Or is the $49.99/year all-inclusive?? I would LOVE to know! Thanks:) 

    -Maura

  • Anonymous

    @Maura

    email us at songwriterinfo@tunecore.com with your TuneCore account email address and we will flag your account to have the songwriter service option appear
    Jamie and his team will then be able to follow up and answer all questions etc
    and thank you for watching the NY Seminar info!

    jeff

  • http://www.lorimalvey.com Lori Malvey

    WHAT WORRIES ME ABOUT THIS: They say in Europe you can’t just get a gig the way we do here in the USA. I very much want to keep this freedom and privilege. The red tape involved in the European model scares me. Consider this scenario: Uncle Sam, under the guise of “helping the musician get his money”, adds new laws and makes it like Europe. I’d rather keep my freedom ANY DAY than have the government monitor me, tell me how and what and where and when I can play, with the requirement of a license or permit in order to do so. I want to keep booking and this right between the club owner/restaurant/church/hotel and me. The USA can keep my money as far as I’m concerned. And I’d rather fight a greedy businessman than a government that has laws and fines and courts on it’s side ANY day of the week…Lori

  • Robert

    Jeff, have you been hanging out with Mark Northam?  He’s been on the ASCAP case (from the songwriter’s perspective) for eons.

  • Edwardenriquez

    become your own publisher and then you will have true control of your compositions

  • Anonymous

    by default, you are your own publisher the second you write a song and make it tangible

blog comments powered by Disqus